Download
Please Verify that you are Human
Spoiler Warning: This review contains major spoilers for The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997).
There is something strange about The Lost World: Jurassic Park.
It was directed by Steven Spielberg, brought back Jeff Goldblum as Ian Malcolm, delivered bigger dinosaurs, darker action, and one of the wildest finales of the 1990s.
And yet, for years, it has lived in the enormous shadow of the original Jurassic Park.
So, is The Lost World actually an underrated sequel?
My rating: 4/5
The Lost World Had an Almost Impossible Job
Following Jurassic Park was never going to be easy.
The original had wonder, suspense, groundbreaking visual effects, memorable characters, and Spielberg operating at blockbuster peak.
Instead of copying that formula, The Lost World makes a smart decision: it gets darker.
Isla Sorna feels less like a theme park and more like a genuine wilderness. The dinosaurs aren’t attractions anymore. They’re animals in their own territory.
That change gives the sequel its own personality.
Jeff Goldblum Gets to Lead
Goldblum’s Malcolm was one of the original’s most entertaining characters, and putting him at the center was an obvious choice.
Here, Malcolm is more than comic relief.
He’s dealing with the consequences of what happened on Isla Nublar while trying to protect Sarah and the rest of the expedition.
Goldblum still brings that sarcastic Malcolm energy, but the character feels more vulnerable this time.
The Dinosaurs Are Incredible
This is where The Lost World remains ridiculously entertaining.
The trailer sequence is fantastic. The T-Rex attack on the camp is brutal. The Velociraptor scenes are tense.
And the digital dinosaurs had advanced considerably in the four years since the first film. Even Rotten Tomatoes’ current critics’ consensus specifically recognizes the leap in CGI effects.
The practical and digital effects still give the animals physical weight, which helps the action scenes hold up surprisingly well.
The San Diego Finale Is Completely Insane
Then the movie does something nobody expects.
It brings the T-Rex to San Diego.
Suddenly, The Lost World stops being a jungle survival movie and becomes a giant-monster movie.
Is it realistic? Absolutely not.
Is it memorable?
Definitely.
Spielberg stages the T-Rex like a classic movie monster, letting it wander through suburban streets, smash vehicles, and terrorize a modern city.
It is ridiculous in exactly the way a late-1990s dinosaur blockbuster could afford to be.
But the Human Story Isn't as Strong
This is where the sequel struggles.
Ian and Sarah work well enough, but some supporting characters feel like they exist mainly to become dinosaur food.
Peter Ludlow is also much less interesting than Hammond. His desire to exploit the dinosaurs gives the movie a clear human villain, but the character can feel cartoonish.
The original had a strong emotional balance between Alan, Ellie, Hammond, Malcolm, and the children.
The Lost World doesn’t quite reach that level.
The Movie Can Feel Uneven
The biggest problem is pacing.
The first half is a survival adventure. Then the movie becomes a hunt. Then it becomes a rescue mission. Finally, it’s basically Godzilla with a T-Rex.
That variety can be fun, but it also makes the movie feel less focused.
This is close to the criticism reflected in Rotten Tomatoes’ current consensus: the effects had advanced significantly, but the sequel struggled to become as compelling as the original.
Why Some Fans Have Reconsidered It
Here’s the interesting part: The Lost World has qualities that later franchise entries sometimes lacked.
It has Spielberg’s visual control.
It has genuinely suspenseful dinosaur sequences.
It takes the consequences of the first movie seriously.
And it isn’t afraid to make the dinosaurs frightening again.
The current audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is 52%, showing that its reputation remains mixed rather than universally beloved.
But a mixed reputation doesn’t mean the movie has nothing going for it.
So, Is It Spielberg's Most Underrated Sequel?
That depends on what you want from a sequel.
If you’re looking for the wonder and perfectly balanced adventure of Jurassic Park, The Lost World can feel like a step down.
But if you want a darker dinosaur thriller with excellent creature work, memorable set pieces, Jeff Goldblum, and one absolutely bonkers third act, there’s plenty to appreciate.
It isn’t a perfect sequel.
But it is much more interesting than its reputation sometimes suggests.
Final Verdict
The Lost World: Jurassic Park — 4/5
The Lost World doesn’t recreate the magic of the original—and honestly, trying to do that may have been the wrong goal.
Instead, Spielberg gives us something rougher, darker, and occasionally stranger.
Some characters are underwritten. The pacing wanders. The San Diego finale is pure blockbuster madness.
But when that T-Rex steps into the city, the movie suddenly reminds you why you came.
For dinosaur fans, that alone is difficult to ignore.
FAQs
1. Is The Lost World: Jurassic Park underrated?
Its reputation is mixed. Rotten Tomatoes currently lists 57% from critics and 52% from audiences, so calling it “underrated” is a matter of personal assessment rather than a settled critical consensus.
2. Is The Lost World better than Jurassic Park?
The two movies have different strengths. Jurassic Park has greater critical reception and is generally praised for its combination of wonder, suspense, and character work, while The Lost World leans harder into darker survival action.
3. Why did Steven Spielberg make The Lost World darker?
The sequel moves away from the controlled theme-park setting and places characters inside a wild dinosaur environment, naturally creating a more threatening tone.
4. Is the San Diego ending good?
It’s intentionally exaggerated and works more like a classic giant-monster sequence than the grounded survival suspense of the first half. Whether it works depends heavily on how much you enjoy that tonal shift.
5. Is The Lost World worth watching today?
Yes, particularly for fans of dinosaur movies, Spielberg’s action filmmaking, Jeff Goldblum, and practical/CG creature effects. Its weaknesses are easier to notice, but many of its major set pieces still hold up.